Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V running on a Quad-Core Intel Xeon 7300 series processor-based DL580 G5 server providing a high-level view of the benefits of virtualization. In this demo, you will see Linux and Windows Guest OS environments running side by side in a virtualized environment with the easy to use Hyper-V interface.

25 Responses to “Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V Demo on Quad-Core Intel Xeon”

  • sayhotdog:

    is xeon used in xbox 360

  • yowyowjim:

    oke i think am fool … or idk …. ( for what help me that ….? how or with what can help me this ,,windows server 2008” ? pff

  • LeoNatan25:

    What do you mean “free website”? One of the roles the Windows 2008 servers can take is web servers, but they are far from free. If you want to create a website for educational purposes, you can use the IIS already available in the regular Windows versions (like XP, Vista, 7, etc). If you are looking for something more serious, but still free, I suggest alternatives like Apache (but much harder to manage for the newbie user).

  • KawazoeJapan:

    Pardon me sir :D

    That comment is so old that I don’t even remember if I wrote the release of Windows NT 4.0 Server or if it’s just a typo.

    But You are indeed right, it was the old days of Windows NT 3.1 Advanced Server… So old I wasn’t even born!

  • LeoNatan25:

    Shows how little you know about the server operating systems.

  • LeoNatan25:

    It works in Windows Server 2008 R1, but starting with WS2008 R2, Microsoft is only releasing 64bit versions of the Server line. Time to move with the times. ;)

  • LeoNatan25:

    Actually, Windows Sever exists from 1993, in the form of Windows NT Advanced Server. :)

  • cjsalda:

    still having issue with vmware . high cpu usage on idle time.
    will figure out shortly. Think that is CLR enhacement service that verify things on the server .

  • retal06:

    Read this: techgeist . net /2009/07/london-stock-exchange-moving-windows-linux/

  • jwd0808:

    That is a very ignorant statement. Linux is not always the best choice – it depends on the situation. No one needs either OS. Server 2008 is very, very stable and is used by many fortune 500 corporations.

  • mithrandir1988:

    thank you!

  • mithrandir1988:

    Only if you include an acually intelligible documentation for ‘free linux’.

  • grandmastgarth:

    Yes, No and No.

  • gr4tuitou5:

    All microsoft operating systems are on some sort of drug. Not the performance enhancing ones unfortunately :(

  • espire1111:

    Sounds to me like this is something like RAID?

    provides Redundancy/ Parity?

    He’s talking about amalgamating multiple servers to fuction as one, and then operate using Partitioning?

    no?

  • countryshmountry:

    lolz

  • chreed34:

    lmfao

  • falkerhard:

    lol?

  • fowlermakesmusic:

    If you don’t know what windows Server is, then you should use snow leopard or get an Xserve

  • falkerhard:

    If you don’t know what Windows Server is, then you should use Vista.

  • retal06:

    try free linux with free vmware server – you don’t need windows server 2008

  • batlibya2010:

    thank u

  • jholttn:

    Think of Windows XP on Crack – I use it on one of my servers at home.

  • kurizzos:

    Does hyper v work on a 32 bit OS?

  • KawazoeJapan:

    Windows Server is simply an OS optimized for server use. Out of the box, it can provide Web Server, Domain Controller, DNS, File service and many more in a Windows environment.

    A hyper-visor is a bridge between software and hardware to provide system virtualization. Those virtualized system can then run at the same time on the same physical machine by having they own BIOS and memory pages. Hyper-V, Xen and VM-Ware are example of hyper-visors.

    History fact : Windows Server exist since 1996.

Leave a Reply