Posts Tagged ‘should’
FTC head says he supports AMA. He should be investigating it.
FTC Chairman Leibowitz is courting the American Medical Association (AMA). That’s not a plus for consumers.
Read more on The Christian Science Monitor
We are developing an information system to capture client information. Which database should we use?
It should be secure. It should be scalable. It will be located on our in-house server. Each of 10 employees computers are connected to the server. An intranet will host a web site that will connect the employees to the database. This internal web site will be how information is stored on, processed and retrieved from the database. Our external web site will be hosted on the same server. The external web site will be used by clients and will pull certain information from the database. We also need mail-merge functionality. Information from the database needs to populate word document templates. We currently use an ACT! database to fullfill this need and an access database for all other information. Our server and all computers run on Windows. I’ve been leaning towards mySQL however I’m not sure how mail-merge and mySQL relate. I am the least knowledgable about mail-merge. However, the ability to have stored information populate certain documents is imperative.
I have a project for my school that I have to install Linux Somba Server on two computers and then connect them creating a network. I have set up the computers (Connected the power, mainframe, keyboards, mice, and monitors). I am about to install Linux on the two computers. Are there any configurations that should be done during the setup?
Every two months I run a white-space Gutman washer. I delete all my files the same way. I use that same method for all temp files. My internet runs via proxy. I encrypt all my files using a 2056k file encryption program. What else can I do? It does not seem like enough?
Using an HP MSA1510i iSCSI SAN with dual network modules, how should it and Windows Server 2003 be setup to provide full multipath redundancy?
I’ve tried using different subnets, but the MPIO on W2k3 wants them to be in the same subnet. I’ve tried using different IPs in the same subnet, but again the MPIO on W2k3 tries to make both NICs hit the same iSCSI target IP. I’ve tried configuring SA0 and SB0 to the same IP, but SB0 fails saying the IP address is in use.
I have the physical hardware called for with this configuration. The docs with the MSA1510i are practically worthless – it doesn’t actually explain HOW to set this up. All it says is that you need a second switch, etc.
I have the hardware it says is needed. What I need is more information on configuring the HP MSA1510i and Windows Server 2003 to work in a multipath configuration.
Any suggestions?
Just to be clear, the reason for MPIO, the second switch, the second NIC, etc. is for redundancy.
Adding a second IP address to the existing single physical port SA0 does not actually provide redundancy. First, SA0 is managed by the first controller, so if that controller hangs or goes offline, so do your disks. That is why SB0 is used for the redundant connection (or SB1, whatever your configuration dictates).
or how do i know if my current windows is x86 or x64?
is there a piece of hardware i need to look at to get this information?